There is nothing like money to make you attractive and appealing to others. But, of course, the kind of people who are attracted to you only because of what you can do for them may be acquaintances, not friends. You may have many acquaintances if you become wealthy, but whatever your station in life may be, you will never have true friends unless you are a friend to others. Be very selective in your choice of friends. Choose to associate with positive people who like you for the person you are, who encourage you to be yourself and to be the best you can be.

To Do this Day.

As soon as it begins, take control of your day. Decide in detail what you intend to do and commit to making it happen.
If you sit around and wait for events and circumstances to pull you along, you’ll end up getting nothing accomplished. If you have no firm and resolute plans, you’ll waste all your time on meaningless distractions and interruptions.
Certainly unexpected situations will come up that require your response. Yet you can choose to respond from a position of power and control, rather than from a position of weakness and ineffectiveness.
Decide what you will do with this day, and get busy doing it. Make a difference, establish a positive momentum, and get your goals accomplished.
Time is here, right now, for you to use. Transform the passing time into lasting value by making effective use of it.
This day is filled with great possibilities. Choose certain, specific ones, and make the effort that will make them happen.

if it smells like socialism, looks like socialism, and feels like socialism, it’s probably…

Fed hits banks with sweeping pay limitsThe Wall Street Journal – Oct. 23, 2009
(Copyright (c) 2009, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

By Aaron Lucchetti, David Enrich and Joann S. Lublin In a one-two punch at the pay culture of banks and Wall Street firms blamed for the financial crisis, the U.S. government announced plans to aggressively regulate compensation at thousands of lenders and impose steep pay cuts at seven companies that received billions in federal aid.

While the moves had been anticipated for weeks, Thursday’s separate announcements by the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department represent unprecedented federal intervention in pay decisions traditionally left to boards and shareholders.

The crackdown is likely to influence how financial firms pay top executives, traders, loan officers and others whose actions could threaten the soundness of the institutions. Compensation experts said it would be hard for companies to escape the new oversight, though individuals could do so by jumping to hedge funds, private-equity funds and other financial firms beyond the reach of the new curbs.

The central bank moved to incorporate reviews of compensation into its routine regulatory process, a step that will affect large and small financial firms across the U.S. as well as American subsidiaries of non-U.S. financial companies. Some state regulators said they plan to issue similar requirements for state-regulated banks not covered by the Fed plan.

“I think it will make an important difference” because many banks have been reluctant to change their pay practices unilaterally out of competitive worries, said New York’s banking superintendent, Richard Neiman.

As expected, Treasury official Kenneth Feinberg said cash salaries paid to the highest-earning executives at seven companies getting exceptional federal aid will be capped at $500,000, while the group’s total pay level, annualized, will be 50% lower than a year before.

Some bankers and outside experts said Mr. Feinberg was overstating the extent of the cuts. Many bankers will continue to enjoy seven-figure pay packages, including one who will receive $9.9 million. Of the 136 employees whose pay Mr. Feinberg reviewed, 29 are on track to collect total 2009 pay of at least $5 million, according to documents released by Mr. Feinberg. And his calculations of 50% cuts in total pay for the top 25 at each firm from a year before depend partly on departures of certain highly paid employees.

The rulings will be effective for just November and December; employees won’t have to repay salaries already received. But the rulings will become the starting point for next year’s salary figures and until the companies repay their government aid.

To make sure firms follow the new rules, Mr. Feinberg imposed reporting requirements on top executives and directors. He said he hopes the standards “will be voluntarily picked up” throughout corporate America.

The rulings cover the highest-paid 25 employees at each of the seven heavily aided companies: Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp., American International Group Inc., General Motors Co., GMAC Inc., Chrysler Group LLC and Chrysler Financial.

Mr. Feinberg said he will have to approve pay for the next chief executive at Bank of America. He already pushed outgoing CEO Kenneth Lewis into giving back $1 million he received so far this year and forgoing the rest of his $1.5 million salary for 2009.

Some critics said that Mr. Feinberg was too soft on the banks and that his main accomplishment — forcing firms to use more stock and less cash when paying employees — didn’t go far enough to rein in compensation. “We’re worried that it’s shifting from one form of compensation to another and still letting people get away with some pretty outrageous things,” said Sarah Anderson, an executive-pay analyst with the left-leaning Institute for Policy Studies in Washington.

While the Fed didn’t propose pay caps, it said it will review compensation policies at “28 large, complex banking organizations,” which it didn’t identify. It will be a “horizontal review” that in effect compares them to one another. The Fed also proposed that pay of traders and other employees be linked to the risks taken to achieve returns. So if two people generate $1 million in revenue each, one who took more chances could be paid less.

Analysts noted that one surefire sign of risk — bets that use a lot of borrowed money — could stay out of style if the Fed uses risk-adjusted returns to assess how employees should get paid.

Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse Group and some other Wall Street firms already have moved to overhaul pay, including shifting more of it to salary.

Some small-town bankers are resentful of the coming scrutiny by the Fed, blaming many of the foolish loans and reckless trades that led to the financial crisis on larger institutions. “We’re all having to pay for the sins” of the big banks, said Rusty Cloutier, CEO of MidSouth Bancorp Inc., Lafayette, La.

Since the spring, banks have been fretting over the effect of a provision in the economic-stimulus law that restricts bonuses — historically the lion’s share of top bankers’ compensation — to a fraction of salaries. The worry has been that the combination of this provision, inserted by Sen. Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.), and coming salary curbs by Mr. Feinberg would severely depress overall compensation.

At Citigroup, some executives were relieved Mr. Feinberg’s demands were not tougher. While salaries will be paid more in stock than cash, their total values aren’t expected to shrink in most cases, said people familiar with the matter.

Citigroup executives have been worried that severe curbs could spark an exodus of top traders and bankers. That hasn’t happened. Citigroup has suffered many high-ranking defections, but those executives say their departures didn’t stem from dissatisfaction with pay.

Citigroup said it is “pleased this decision has been issued and we will now work to comply with the plan’s requirements.”

Bank of America officials reached out to those affected by the Feinberg ruling to reassure them pay is “still very healthy,” said a person familiar with the situation. But some remain concerned the firm may face trouble recruiting in its global banking and markets group, run by Thomas Montag — who was identified by people familiar with the matter as the person with the $9.9 million pay package, one of the largest disclosed Thursday by Mr. Feinberg.